Capital One Commercial Bank · Enabling Tools · 2022

Rethinking document management.

A request to connect two systems became the opening to redesign the work around documents. I used the integration as leverage to study hundreds of existing users first.

Research to redesign
Integration requestWorkflow researchShared-context redesign
Shared contextRelated filesComplete
A feature request became a workflow redesign.Integration request → Associate research → Shared-context upload
My roleSole product designer and researcher, embedded for a year
Working withProduct managers, engineers, and commercial banking associates
Starting pointA Salesforce integration request, and hundreds of existing users
OutcomeImplemented experience, NPS improved by 31 points

01 · The strategic uncertainty

A feature request arrived. The workflow underneath it had never been examined.

A document management tool had been built to centralize storage. Over time, teams submitted feature requests that prioritized functionality over a coherent experience.

When business leaders asked for a better Salesforce integration so associates could upload directly, I saw an opening. The request came with access to hundreds of people already using the tool, and nobody had asked them anything.

What the initiative was funded to achieveStated business goals
25%targeted reduction in hours spent handling documents
$1Min projected cost savings from that reduction
1tool established as the single source of truth for documents

These were the business goals, not measured outcomes. I have kept the distinction because the implemented redesign was measured on NPS, and the savings targets were never independently verified to me.

02 · The system I was designing inside

Four constraints on a tool nobody had designed for end to end.

I was the first embedded designer this team had worked with. My approach was to introduce human centered design and research, offer a perspective the team did not have, and keep asking why. These four lenses are how I kept that question answerable rather than annoying.

S

Systems

Engineering & platform owners

Can context move between tools that were never connected?

Fails when ignored: Another silo that associates reconcile by hand.

A

Associate

Commercial banking associates

Does it fit the way associates already handle documents?

Fails when ignored: A feature that exists but nobody has time to discover.

B

Business

Product & Enabling Technologies leadership

Does it reduce handling time and consolidate the record?

Fails when ignored: A cleaner screen with the same cost underneath it.

C

Client

The commercial banking client

Does the client get an answer faster because of it?

Fails when ignored: Internal tidiness the client never feels.

03 · The pivotal move

REFRAMED AND LED BY ME

I turned an integration request into the team's first piece of real research.

A team new to formal user research. A short term deliverable. One chance to widen it.

I built both a short term and a longer term research strategy: answer the integration question well enough to keep the commitment, and use the same access to understand how documents actually move through the associate workflow.

The output: what we needed to learnShort term and longer term
01
Research question

How do associates group documents before an upload begins?

Why it matters

The feature request assumed one document at a time. The real grouping behavior determined the shape of the workflow.

How we would learnAssociate interviewsCommercial banking associates
02
Research question

What information is shared across a batch, and what varies by file?

Why it matters

Separating shared context from file-specific details would reveal where repeated metadata entry could be removed.

How we would learnWorkflow observationLive upload sessions
03
Research question

Where do associates hesitate, repeat work, or leave the primary upload path?

Why it matters

Observing breakdowns could distinguish a missing capability from an existing feature that people could not find.

How we would learnFeature walkthroughsExisting tool users
04
Research question

How does context move between Salesforce, the upload tool, and the repository?

Why it matters

Following information across systems would show whether the fix belonged in one interface or in the handoffs between them.

How we would learnProcess mappingCommercial real estate loan flow
“The integration was the ask. The hundreds of people already using the tool were the opportunity.”

04 · From evidence to insight

The interface was asking people to recreate information the system already had.

Associates were entering the same metadata repeatedly for related documents. A feature that would have solved it already existed, and almost nobody used it. Underneath both problems sat a set of tools that could not pass context to each other.

01

“I have to put in the client identifier numbers and client name again, even if you selected you have ten documents to be uploaded for the same client.”

Commercial banking associate

Related documents are tagged one at a time

Associates upload documents that share a client or a type, then re-enter identical metadata for every single file.

AssociateSystems
So what

Enter shared information once, then ask only for what differs.

02

“I just don't use this tool often enough. I don't have time to play around with the system.”

Associate, on the existing common metadata feature

A feature that exists but was never found

Common metadata was built alongside the core experience rather than inside it, so nobody had time to discover it.

AssociateBusiness
So what

Put the shortcut on the main path. An unused capability is not a capability.

03

Without an integration, associates copied identifiers between Salesforce and the document tool, then added proof of the upload by hand.

Workflow observation across tools

Proof of work was being recreated manually

Disconnected systems meant the record of what happened had to be rebuilt in a second place, every time.

SystemsClient
So what

Pass the Record ID through, then return a shareable link that closes the loop.

05 · The redesign

Enter shared information once. Add only what is different.

Most associates upload documents tied to a company identifier, know what information is required, and then select document types. I designed the flow around that pattern while leaving room for the cases that do not fit it.

Document upload screen for entering information common to a group of related files
Start with shared informationThe associate enters the loan or client context once, before touching a file, because that context is what every document in the group has in common.
AssociateBusiness
Document selection screen showing shared information retained across uploaded files
Add related documents togetherCommon information stays visible while files are selected, so the association between them is never in doubt and never re-typed.
AssociateSystems
Document upload screen requesting only the additional details unique to each file
Ask only for what differsA container design focuses attention on the additional detail each file needs, which is the only place per-document work is genuinely required.
AssociateBusiness

06 · Connecting Salesforce

Carry context into the tool, and return proof when the work is done.

Research showed the existing workflow forced associates to add proof of their upload back into Salesforce by hand, purely because the systems did not talk. I proposed passing the Record ID and company information directly into the document tool, then returning a link that made the follow up unnecessary.

Salesforce handoff into the central document management upload flow with company context included
Carry context across the handoffInitiating an upload from Salesforce redirects into the central tool with the company information and Record ID already attached, so nothing is re-keyed.
SystemsAssociate
Upload confirmation showing documents linked to Salesforce and a shareable link
Close the loop with proofConfirmation states that the documents are linked via the Record ID and returns a shareable link, which also served a link sharing initiative already underway.
SystemsClient

07 · The longer view

The immediate redesign pointed at a much larger service problem.

I mapped how documents and their data moved across the tools used in the commercial real estate loan process. Disconnected systems led to redundant data entry, lost documents, and manual work that extended the time required to close deals. Teal marks where the friction concentrated.

Journey stage

Intake

Documents arrive

Tagging

Context is recreated

Upload

Work crosses tools

Handoff

Proof is rebuilt
Friction concentration
Context arrives unstructuredRedundant work concentrates
Workflow pattern
Context is recreatedProof and identifiers move by hand
Associate action

Collects documents from the client

Tags each file with client and document type

Uploads into the central document management tool

Records proof of the upload elsewhere

System in play

Email and shared drives

Salesforce

Central document management tool

Final repository tool

Workflow breakdown

Documents arrive without enough context to connect them to the wider workflow.

The same client metadata is entered repeatedly for related files.

Identifiers are moved between Salesforce and the upload flow by hand.

Data stays trapped in the document and proof of work is recreated manually.

Opportunity

Attach client and deal context at the start.

Enter shared information once and retain it across the group.

Pass the Record ID and company context through the handoff.

Return a shareable link and pull the repository closer to the start of the process.

Evidence + decision
Supporting research

Associates received related documents through channels that did not preserve structured context.

Synthesized workflow observation
Roadmap decision

Showed that the service problem began before the upload interface.

Supporting research

Related documents shared identifiers, but the workflow asked for those identifiers one file at a time.

Associate interviews and workflow observation
Roadmap decision

Produced the shared-information-first structure used in the redesign.

Supporting research

Disconnected systems forced associates to recreate context the organization already held.

Synthesized workflow observation
Roadmap decision

Turned the Salesforce integration into a way to remove re-keying rather than simply add an entry point.

Supporting research

Associates manually rebuilt the record of a completed upload in another system.

Synthesized workflow observation
Roadmap decision

Made the wider case for connecting document data across the service.

Scroll horizontally to follow the full journey on smaller screens.

I presented this to the whole Commercial Bank Enabling Technologies organization, arguing for a common space where associates could share the documents and data they need, and for pulling the final repository tool toward the start of the process rather than the end.

08 · Bringing it to life

What shipped, and what it left behind.

I led the handoff process to build a design and engineering collaboration culture in a team that had only handled small design requests before, and worked with the product manager to break the redesign into manageable steps with phased technical requirements.

Shipped

The redesigned upload flow

Shared information first, related files together, and only the differences asked per document.

Implemented
Shipped

The Salesforce integration

Record ID passed through, documents linked back, and a shareable link returned.

Implemented
Practice

A design and engineering handoff

A collaboration process for a team that had previously only handled small design requests.

Introduced
Direction

Unlocking data trapped in documents

Service blueprints showing how document data could move across the disconnected tools around us.

Presented to the org

09 · Impact

IMPLEMENTED AFTER MY ROTATION

A measured improvement, and three goals I will not claim as results.

The design was implemented after I had moved to the second team of my rotational program. The tool's NPS improved by 31 points. The time reduction and savings figures were business goals, not measured outcomes, and I have kept them labelled that way.

Measured+31point improvement in NPSAfter the redesign was implemented
Goal25%reduction in document handling timeA stated business goal, not a measured result
Goal$1Min projected cost savingsA stated business goal, not a measured result
Goal1tool as the single source of truthThe consolidation the initiative was funded to pursue
Empathy inside the team

My education emphasized empathy with end users. My first end to end corporate project taught me that empathizing with team members is just as necessary to advocate for the user.

The whole context

Stepping back to see how the tool fits the entire associate workflow is what made the longer term vision arguable while I was still shipping short term changes.

A pull toward strategy

Aligning research and design objectives with broader business goals is where I found the work most interesting, more than implementing quick fixes.

Advocacy as a method

The integration request was the leverage. Using it to study the hundreds of people already in the tool is what turned a feature into a direction.

I used a feature request to earn the right to study the workflow underneath it, shipped a redesign that people measurably preferred, and left the organization with a map of the problem that was too big for one tool.